Pay in installments of $12.50 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 22 - Aug 27
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Mercury 50-31976 Delco Remy 1113517 Starter Motor No Pinion Gear 1000E 650E 850EPart Number(s) Included Mercury 50 31976 Starter Motor Assembly Delco Remy 1113517 (No Pinion Gear unfortunately) Typically would have accepted a 10 tooth Pinion. The part number for this pinion is 32406 and is usually available on eBay or just swap from your existing starter. General Application Compatibility Mercury 1000E (6cyl) [SN 1464949 thru 1758688] 1962 1964 Mercury 650E (4cyl) [SN 1542745 thru 1761648] 1963 1964 Mercury 650S (4cyl) [SN
Part Number(s) Included
- Mercury 50-31976 Starter Motor Assembly
- Delco-Remy 1113517
- (No Pinion Gear unfortunately)
- Typically would have accepted a 10-tooth Pinion. The part number for this pinion is 32406 and is usually available on eBay or just swap from your existing starter.
General Application / Compatibility
- Mercury 1000E (6cyl) [SN 1464949 thru 1758688] 1962-1964
- Mercury 650E (4cyl) [SN 1542745 thru 1761648] 1963-1964
- Mercury 650S (4cyl) [SN 1572323 thru 1763993] 1963-1964
- Mercury 850E (6cyl) [SN 1566240 thru 1757938] 1963-1964
Other Details
- Freshwater Used Parts
- Tested
Purchase with confidence!
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.9 ★★★★★
Based on 7 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 1
Frame too short
Color: Beige, Size: 132in-Large Metal Base
Can’t be assemble due to the frame being too short
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 20, 2026
★★★★★ 5
great room divider
This room divider is very nice, good fabric, blocks light, not entirely bit alot for my needs. covers or blocks
what i dont want others to see, the assembly was some difficulty but he end product is fantastic.. i recommend fully.. thank you for a great product
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 25, 2024
★★★★★ 4
Offers Complete Privacy
Color: Black, Size: 132in-Large Metal Base
We tried others that were nice but this particular room divider adds total privacy. We were looking for that. Easy to assemble. There is no gap if you position each petition close enough. The guality is very nice. Exactly what we were looking for.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 24, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Versatile Room Divider With Easy Assembly and Strong Coverage
Size: 3 Panel 12FT W
I picked up this Siebwin 3-panel folding room divider mainly for privacy and room separation, and overall it works very well.
Assembly is very straightforward, and the divider can be set up, taken apart, and stored without much effort. The fabric quality feels good, and the frame construction is stronger and more stable than expected. The support tubes especially feel well built and help keep the divider standing securely.
One feature I really liked is the flexibility of the design. The panels can be used together as a complete divider or separated depending on the setup and available space. That makes it much more versatile for different room layouts or temporary privacy needs.
The coverage is also very good, and the size matches the manufacturer’s description accurately. The fabric blocks light and background visibility well enough to provide solid privacy without feeling overly heavy. The wider feet also help improve stability compared to thinner folding dividers.
Another positive detail is that everything arrived complete with no missing parts or damaged pieces, which made assembly much easier and faster.
Compared to cheaper privacy screens, this one feels more durable and easier to customize depending on the situation. In terms of value for the money, it feels like a very practical and worthwhile purchase considering the size, flexibility, and build quality.
Overall, a versatile and well-built room divider with easy assembly, strong privacy coverage, stable construction, complete included parts, flexible panel configuration, and excellent everyday functionality.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 27, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Stable, flexible in deployment configuration, creates true privacy and looks great.
Size: 3 Panel 12FT W
This is the second room divider panel I have installed, and there are several features about this one that I like much better than my older one.
The fact that there are no gaps and that the material is thicker means you get more privacy or more hiding power, if you wish. My older divider has vertical spaces between each of the panels and the panels are half as wide as the Siebwin panels, so there are many vertical spaces. The Siebwin divider really creates privacy.
Another feature that I really appreciate is that the legs are wider and stand off from the floor. On my older one the legs are flat and they're rather awkward to adjust because they create more drag on the floor. The feet on the older one also loosen if you turn them counter clockwise, so adjustments of configuration that require the feet to be moved are more complex.
The older divider also must be deployed in a zig-zag fashion because he feet are not as wide, but this new one can be deployed and stable in a straight, an "N" shape or an arc. They are both the same length, but because the older one must be use in a zig-zag deployment it doesn't reach to the length of the new one.
The Siebwin divider definitely costs more at $103.48, but it sports several features and advantages over the other brand, so it does a better job and is worth the extra cost.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 25, 2026